Investigating
the correlation between the intelligence and the performance in repetitive
learning tasks |
E.J.Gorzelanczyk,
P.A.Wozniak, H.Chrzastowska, Mar 25, 1998 |
Do
intelligent students learn faster?
The article presented below seems to indicate that
your IQ does not really matter much in learning with SuperMemo!
It has been shown earlier that the learning process
in SuperMemo correlates strongly with your learning results. Strangely,
good students showed lower retention as measured by SuperMemo!
This can easily be explained by the fact that SuperMemo is based on self-grading.
Critical students provide lower grades and thus reduce their retention
measurements. However, their high self-criticism pays off when it comes
to exams that verify the learned knowledge. The fact that little correlation
has been found between the same learning parameters and the IQ and its
components, indicate that the motivational factor may really play a
much higher role in learning that it is popularly perceived.
The conclusions for you, the user of SuperMemo:
-
Never say: "I am too stupid to learn it". If
you cannot understand something, you probably miss some facts needed to
complete the picture or perhaps the book you are studying is just badly
written. Do not blame yourself! If you really try and you cannot, it probably
is not your fault
-
Never say: "I have too bad memory to really learn
it". The experience of thousands of students of SuperMemo is that on
average we differ very little as far as basic memory properties are concerned!
Some students can really better structure the material to learn and thus
learn really fast but with SuperMemo ... you will be forced to develop
better mnemonic techniques (ways to structure the material in your memory).
Otherwise the intractable material will make your repetitions a living
hell. With time, you will see that your speed of learning does not differ
much from the speed of other students.
-
What really counts most in learning is motivation!
If you really want to learn something, the only true limitation is time
and the availability of a well-written (or well-structured) learning material.
With SuperMemo, your memory no longer is a factor!
|
The authors have been investigating the
applications of repetition spacing algorithms in learning (note that
SuperMemo algorithm is a repetition spacing algorithm).
As significant variations in the speed of learning have been observed among
the tested students, the question has been raised about the possibility
of finding a correlation between the components of intelligence and personality
and various measures of the learning process in a group of students.
In the presented study, thirteen different
measures of the learning process have been juxtaposed against fourteen
components of intelligence as measured by the Wechsler test for Polish
population. Thirty students participated in the test. Their IQ has been
measured and they all have been subject to a learning process based on
repetition spacing lasting twelve months.
Earlier studies have shown that such
a learning process, when based on self-grading, often shows surprising
negative correlation between the measured knowledge retention
and final knowledge tests. Better students, i.e. those who fared well
in the final test, have consistently showed lowered retention measurements
throughout the learning process. In self-grading procedure, it appears
that more critical students provide lower grades at repetitions and consequently
show lower retention as measured by SuperMemo (i.e. not necessarily lower
retention in general); however, their self-criticism and increased repetition
workload make them fare better in verification tests.
In the presented study, the authors
have been looking for correlates between the parameters of the learning
process and various components of intelligence. No significant correlates
have been found. This seems to indicate remote relationship between
the overall intelligence and the learning process that is probably most
visibly affected by motivational factors. Additionally, memory-related
components of intelligence do not play a visibly more significant role
in learning than other components. This indicates that the basic memory
properties of individuals are much less varied in a population than other
factors affecting learning such as motivation or persistence.
Description of the measures of the
learning process:
Last |
The date of
the latest scheduled repetition after 12 months of learning |
1.3s |
The number
of items causing significant difficulties in learning |
Burden |
The measure
of the average number of repetitions per day |
Grade |
The average
grade given in repetitions (0..5 scale) |
Lapses |
The number
of times an average item has been forgotten |
Cases |
The total
number of repetitions made in the entire learning period |
Retention |
The average
retention throughout the learning process |
Day/Rep |
The average
interval between repetitions of an average item |
Interval |
The average
interval between repetitions at the moment of completing the process of
repetitions |
Factor |
The average
difficulty of items as measured at repetitions |
Rep |
The average
number of repetitions afforded an average item in the learning period |
Workload |
The average
time spent on repetitions per day |
Time |
The average
time spent for a single repetition |
Learning-Intelligence correlation coefficients
(absolute values).
All rows and columns have been sorted
for the highest averages (best correlates at the top-left).
Highest correlation has been found
for the following pairs:
-
picture ordering vs. latest repetition
-
dictionary test vs. the number of most
intractable items
-
similarities test vs. average number of
repetitions per day
No absolute value of any single correlation
coefficient has passed the 0.5 barrier. Most notably, the correlation
between the overall IQ and the retention was nearly zero!
test/parameter
|
Last
|
1.3s
|
Burden
|
Grade
|
Lapses
|
Cases
|
Retention
|
Day/Rep
|
Interval
|
Factor
|
Rep
|
Workload
|
Time
|
Average
|
Maximum
|
similarities
|
0.251435
|
0.115108
|
0.186151
|
0.357474
|
0.192339
|
0.044872
|
0.217379
|
0.446996
|
0.33504
|
0.02327
|
0.126113
|
0.096549
|
0.292984
|
0.219493
|
0.446996
|
dictionary
|
0.19587
|
0.447874
|
0.085428
|
0.201719
|
0.274271
|
0.3069
|
0.261952
|
0.245754
|
0.109595
|
0.360766
|
0.129229
|
0.010174
|
0.041797
|
0.196172
|
0.447874
|
ordering
pictures
|
0.459928
|
0.007164
|
0.280348
|
0.355465
|
0.104795
|
0.0405
|
0.101342
|
0.325604
|
0.232347
|
0.172744
|
0.098151
|
0.19341
|
0.152299
|
0.191012
|
0.459928
|
understanding
|
0.158112
|
0.32479
|
0.1063
|
0.219757
|
0.237604
|
0.255267
|
0.205431
|
0.0492
|
0.10988
|
0.219496
|
0.179659
|
0.148656
|
0.083561
|
0.1575
|
0.32479
|
math
|
0.158216
|
0.220544
|
0.003081
|
0.067041
|
0.293845
|
0.280389
|
0.172424
|
0.093783
|
0.138667
|
0.139241
|
0.064291
|
0.112015
|
0.189514
|
0.150478
|
0.293845
|
repeating
digits
|
0.118939
|
0.03909
|
0.260202
|
0.08776
|
0.098316
|
0.034617
|
0.255651
|
0.050837
|
0.252497
|
0.11774
|
0.0698
|
0.296262
|
0.119755
|
0.134654
|
0.296262
|
knowledge
|
0.303862
|
0.243793
|
0.080728
|
0.048178
|
0.143129
|
0.203255
|
0.161296
|
0.182687
|
0.119038
|
0.046969
|
0.076874
|
0.039605
|
0.12319
|
0.132473
|
0.303862
|
missing
pictures
|
0.246656
|
0.087238
|
0.285121
|
0.239839
|
0.053011
|
0.02366
|
0.01551
|
0.209288
|
0.159637
|
0.026145
|
0.133331
|
0.210475
|
0.01678
|
0.131344
|
0.285121
|
non-verbal
scale
|
0.287654
|
0.126439
|
0.2887
|
0.242132
|
0.079844
|
0.056562
|
0.008464
|
0.03229
|
0.072185
|
0.058815
|
0.127781
|
0.206032
|
0.047984
|
0.118959
|
0.2887
|
verbal scale
|
0.068362
|
0.263983
|
0.14222
|
0.089241
|
0.145248
|
0.10665
|
0.267287
|
0.006614
|
0.0153
|
0.198578
|
0.032647
|
0.063951
|
0.18209
|
0.118753
|
0.267287
|
IQ
|
0.042247
|
0.125142
|
0.171178
|
0.065187
|
0.158327
|
0.147416
|
0.025154
|
0.065028
|
0.029696
|
0.156907
|
0.123413
|
0.201409
|
0.230099
|
0.11278
|
0.230099
|
digit symbols
|
0.005454
|
0.198295
|
0.003
|
0.06796
|
0.014984
|
0.176467
|
0.088343
|
0.154987
|
0.188677
|
0.118531
|
0.343025
|
0.00761
|
0.016567
|
0.10832
|
0.343025
|
bricks
|
0.212143
|
0.000299
|
0.106088
|
0.040137
|
0.04751
|
0.139224
|
0.066777
|
0.000828
|
0.003613
|
0.105972
|
0.16183
|
0.010296
|
0.099978
|
0.09095
|
0.331007
|
puzzles
|
0.007805
|
0.051645
|
0.17159
|
0.065381
|
0.103362
|
0.114531
|
0.052283
|
0.013961
|
0.054225
|
0.041374
|
0.110118
|
0.164811
|
0.056728
|
0.076434
|
0.17159
|
Average
coefficient
|
0.179763
|
0.160815
|
0.15501
|
0.153376
|
0.139042
|
0.137879
|
0.135664
|
0.134133
|
0.130028
|
0.127611
|
0.126876
|
0.125804
|
0.118095
|
|
0.320742
|
Maximum
correlation
|
0.459928
|
0.447874
|
0.2887
|
0.357474
|
0.293845
|
0.3069
|
0.267287
|
0.446996
|
0.33504
|
0.360766
|
0.343025
|
0.296262
|
0.292984
|
0.219493
|
0.459928
|